Posted on

University’s Teacher Education Students Shocked by Visit to Free School

Adam W. Jordan, Ph.D.

 

"What is the purpose of school?"

 

When you ask that question to a group of undergraduate education majors you usually get responses like, "to help prepare people for democracy" or "to prepare people to be independent citizens".  I do not believe I have ever heard a response of, "to make people comply" or "to help people do really well on standardized tests".  

 

Still, we all know that what we communicate verbally regarding the purpose of schools and what actually happens in practice can be drastically different.  

 

In full disclosure, I am an assistant professor of special education at The University of North Georgia.  I suppose in some circles that would make me "The Man", and not in a "he's great" kind of way, either.  Our program, like almost all teacher preparatory programs in the United States, is traditional and we are deeply rooted in the public K-12 system.  However, my background is in public alternative education and I am quite passionate about the transformative power of educational alternatives.  I'm a firm believer that we have to do a better job of exposing traditional teacher education students to the potentials of educational alternatives.

 

So, at UNG we're trying…

 

To start this conversation with undergraduate students I took about a dozen of my juniors and seniors on a field trip to the Freedom to Grow Unschool located right outside Athens, GA in beautiful Madison County.  Lora Smothers, the school's owner was more than kind and welcoming, and so were her jovial, jubilant crew of excited young people.  I wondered what my students would take away from this visit.  Certainly absent were some of the things they are most accustomed to seeing.  There were no rows, no pleas to be quiet, and in at least one case, no shoes!  What was present, though, was a sense of community as children and adults alike gathered around in a circle for introductions and to outline the direction of the day.  Student choice, self-directed learning, and genuine excitement were all present as well.  

 

I could tell that after my students recovered from their initial shock they began to imagine what aspects of this environment they could carry into their much more traditional school placements.  All of a sudden it was much more realistic to have a conversation about how to let students be creative, guide their own learning, and participate in a true democratic classroom.  This conversation was all possible because they had just witnessed all of those things.  I mean, when you watch a group of ten year olds develop a multi-tiered plan for how to engage in play in a safe way that is dependent upon the self-expressed comfort level of the participants, it is hard to argue that your lecture-delivered classroom rule of "respect others" is adequate.  

 

I could continue on about the benefits of our visit to FTGU and I hope that the visit impacts the practice of my students so that they can in turn create a more just, inclusive, welcoming public K-12 schooling experience for the students that will enter their classrooms.  I will end, though, with just a quick plea.  It isn't a plea to those that are already bought in to the idea of educational alternatives.  It is a plea to those who may have an impact on the development of future educators who may be hesitant.  If you have a local educational alternative in your area, give them a call.  They will probably open their arms and welcome you.  Just go hang out.  You can even do so in a shirt and tie with your arms folded, iPad charged, and skepticism high.  Once the students take you outside to show you the really awesome, well-engineered, structurally sound tipi they developed, you'll relax and at the very least, you'll enjoy yourself.  I mean, hey, enjoying yourself can be a purpose of school too!

Posted on

Op-Ed: Are Kids Naturally Lazy or Natural Learners?

It wouldn’t be so bad if the current education debate just involved different ways to achieve the same goals for children. But the reality is much more dangerous.

We are talking about two completely different paradigms: One, the traditional one that is failing, assumes that children are naturally lazy and need to be forced to learn. If you believe that then you need competition for grades, passing and failing, tons of homework, long school days, long school years, No Child Left Behind and Race to the Top.

But modern brain research doesn’t confirm that assumption. Rather, it confirms a second paradigm, that children are natural learners, that the brain is naturally inquisitive. If you operate on that paradigm, as many progressive educators and homeschoolers do, almost none of the approaches mentioned above should be used. The teacher’s role is to actively help the student find resources to explore and learn about everything they are interested in.

In fact, forcing students to be in traditional schools operating on the first assumption creates a self-fulfilling prophecy: After about six or seven years of forcing students to learn things that they aren’t interested in and are often irrelevant to their lives, they do appear to lose interest in learning. That natural ability to learn is gradually extinguished. Anyone who has ever administered standardized tests to that group can see clearly that the rate of improvement on the whole decreases to a crawl, even on those flawed standardized tests. But beyond that, you see the light go out of their eyes. They retreat to watching television and playing video games. Even worse, they retreat to drugs, or in some notorious cases, decide to try to kill people in their schools or themselves.

The latter cases may be rare, but they do reflect that culturally we simply accept as fact that children hate school. Why do we accept that? If children are natural learners and they say they hate school, something is wrong with their school. Something is wrong with many, many schools.

There are schools that children love, and love to go to. These are under the general heading of alternative and progressive. They are learner-centered in their approach. I know of one democratic school in which the children voted to ban all snow days. They didn’t want to miss anything.

Did you wonder why the government never gives statistics comparing home-educated children to publicly educated ones? In many states homeschoolers are required to take standardized tests. The answer might be because in at least one study homeschooled students scored in the 86th percentile nationally.

We need to end No Child Left Behind and Race to the Top. Education is not a race. Nobody tests you in order to allow you to leave the public library. You are assumed to be a natural learner. All people are. All children are. We need to understand the new educational paradigm before it is too late.

Originally published in June, 2010 in Education Revolution Newsletter

 

Posted on

November 30th: Class Dismissed Movie Screening In New York City

Nov 30, 2014 11:00 AM

Be the among the first to see the Class Dismissed movie!

We'd like you to come to a special screening of this powerful documentary. If you are a parent, or want a fresh perspective on education & how people learn, you won't want to miss this one-time showing!

Not only will the filmmakers and be in attendance, but some of experts in the film will be on hand as well. After showing the 90-minute movie, they filmmakers will host a short Q&A session.

We encourage you to invite friends or family who you think will benefit from the alternative education insights this film provides. Jerry Mintz has an interview in the documentary.

Buy tickets here.